<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Big Brand Redesign &#8211; Another new spin on the Pepsi logo.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bnbranding.com/brandinsightblog/big-brand-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bnbranding.com/brandinsightblog/big-brand-redesign/</link>
	<description>Branding Company In Bend Oregon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 20:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Olivier Blanchard		</title>
		<link>https://bnbranding.com/brandinsightblog/big-brand-redesign/#comment-1294</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olivier Blanchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandinsightblog.com/?p=243#comment-1294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The new logo is as dangerously generic as a poorly crafted &quot;message&quot; (next post).

In contrast, the logo behind Pepsi Throwback is a much better direction for the brand. It&#039;s too subdued (blue on blue on blue) but with a little work, it could have actually been a coup for Pepsi from a retail visibility perspective AND to help make Pepsi drinking cool again.

Instead, we got this. *sigh*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new logo is as dangerously generic as a poorly crafted &#8220;message&#8221; (next post).</p>
<p>In contrast, the logo behind Pepsi Throwback is a much better direction for the brand. It&#8217;s too subdued (blue on blue on blue) but with a little work, it could have actually been a coup for Pepsi from a retail visibility perspective AND to help make Pepsi drinking cool again.</p>
<p>Instead, we got this. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
